We received service of notice of Contempt
Proceedings through the Pondicherry court. Court Amin came at 8.45 am to serve
the notice to us.
We are producing below the Office Order and the Order passed in the Court in the Contempt Proceedings filed by the Ashram Trustees against us. Office Order states that notice should be issued to five sisters in the Contempt Proceedings filed by the Trustees. Order passed on 15.09.2014 for issue of notice in contempt proceedings. Mysteriously these orders disappeared today from the official website of the Supreme Court. Why???
It is very interesting to note the amount of trouble the trustees are going to to suppress the facts of the contempt proceedings. Luckily a friend of ours had downloaded them and we have them with us.
Office Order is followed by the Order passed in the Court
Office Order
ITEM NO.10
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 395/2014 In SLP(C) No. 27620/2012
AUROBINDO ASHRAM TRUST Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
JAYASHREE PRASAD & ORS.
(with office report)
Date : 15/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA CHANDRA PANT
For Petitioner(s)
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
and explain as to why contempt proceedings be not
initiated against them for alleged violation of
order dated 29th April, 2014 returnable within two
weeks.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
(Neeta)
Neeta Sapra
Date: 2014.09.15
17:16:57 IST
Sr. P.A.
Reason:
Listed on. 15.09.2014 Court No. 05 Item No. 10
SECTION XII
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 395 OF 2014
IN
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(C)NO. 27620 OF
2012
Aurobindo Ashram Trust ...Petitioner
Versus
Jayashree Prasad & Ors. ...Contemnor/Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
The matter above mentioned was listed before
the Hon'ble Court on 29th April, 2014 ,when the Hon'ble
Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
"The Special Leave Petition is
dismissed.
However, on the request of the
learned counsel for the petitioners,
petitioners are allow to vacate suit premises
upto 31st July, 2014 subject to filing of
usual undertaking within four weeks and
following conditions:
1. Petitioners shall maintain
discipline in the Ashram and follow the rules
and regulations and
2. In case of non-compliance of the
order passed by this Court, it will be open to
the respondents to ask to initiate contempt
proceedings against the petitioners."
It is submitted that Ms. Anitha Shenoy,
Advocate for the Respondents has on 14th August, 2014
filed Contempt Petition against the Contemnors
/Respondents for willful violation of the Court's order
dated 29th April, 2014 which is registered as Contempt
Petition No. 395 of 2014 and copy of the same is placed
with the Special Leave Petition Paper Books.
-2-
The Contempt Petition in the matter above
mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this
office report.
Dated this, the 12th day of September, 2014.
Copy to: Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Advocate
vk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order passed in the Court
ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.5 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F
I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 395/2014
In SLP(C) No. 27620/2012
AUROBINDO ASHRAM
TRUST
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
JAYASHREE PRASAD &
ORS. Respondent(s)
(with office report)
Date : 15/09/2014 This
petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA CHANDRA PANT
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Adv.
Ms. Mamta Saxena, Adv.
Mr. Ritwik Parikh, Adv.
Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv.
Ms. Anitha Shenoy,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Let notice be issued on contemnor respondents
and
explain as to why contempt proceedings be not
initiated against them
for alleged violation
of
order dated 29th April, 2014 returnable within two
weeks.
Let notice be issued also through Court.
Post the matter on 13th October, 2014.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
(Neeta) (Usha
Sharma)
Neeta Sapra
Date: 2014.09.15
17:16:57 IST
Sr. P.A. COURT MASTER
Reason:
No comments:
Post a Comment