With great difficulty and with an even heavier
heart, in spite of losing all hope we were constrained to prefer S.L.P. No.27620/2012
before the Supreme Court of India. Luckily Justice H.L. Gokhale and Justice
Nijjar were hearing our case and they granted us stay.
Thereafter our case was temporarily listed in
April 2014 and without getting listed in the final list it was adjourned to
15.07.2014. However on 26.04.2014 suddenly our case was preponed by about 1 ½ months
and got listed on 29.04.2014 before a new bench comprising of Justice S.J.
Mukhopadhaya and Justice Ranjan Gogoi. Both these judges were totally biased
and without giving us any opportunity to present our case they passed perverse
and malafide order in interim petition, especially when the trial was underway
in the suit for the past four years. These two judges literally threatened our lawyers when they tried to present our case and under two minutes malafide order of eviction was granted on 29.04.2014 by these judges.
Order dated 29.04.2014 is produced hereunder.
ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F
I N D I A
RECORD OF
PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)
No(s).27620/2012
(From the judgement and order dated 03/08/2012 in
CRP No.4219/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)
JAYASHREE PRASAD & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SRI AUROBINDO ASHRAM TRUST & ORS Respondent(s)
With
appln(s) for vacating
interim order dated 28.09.2012,permission to place addl. documents on
record and prayer for interim relief and office report )
Date: 29/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing
today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE
MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Gopal Jain,
Sr. Adv.
Mr. Manu Nair,
Adv.
M/S Suresh A.
Shroff & Co.,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Sanjiv Parikh, Adv.
Mr. B. Parveen, Adv.
Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv.
Mr. N. Vidha, Adv.
Ms. Anitha Shenoy,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The
Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
However,
on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, petitioners are
allow to vacate suit premises upto 31st July, 2014 subject to filing of usual
-2-
undertaking
within four weeks
and following
conditions:
1.
Petitioners shall maintain discipline in the
Ashram and follow the rules and regulations
and
2.
In case of non-compliance of the order
passed by this Court, it will be open to the
respondents to ask to initiate contempt
proceedings against the petitioners.
(Neeta) (Usha Sharma)
Sr.P.A. Court Master
No comments:
Post a Comment