For a second time trustees filed another clarification
petition in M.P. No.2/2008 in C.R.P. 3314/2007 to further clarify the
unambiguous High Court Order dated 04.08.2008.
The trustees misrepresented to Justice K.
Venkataraman that on enquiry by them they have found that ‘International Guest
House’ was unwilling to accommodate the five sisters. They produced the
letter received by them from ‘International Guest House’ but failed to produce
their own letter which they claimed to have written to the guest house
management. This alleged letter has never been made public by them obviously
because no such letter exists!
When the trustees had informed us that ‘International
Guest House were unwilling to accommodate us, we had asked for rooms at ‘Seaside
Guest House’. They were even more furious by this demand and enraged, they
proceeded to file their second clarification without even bothering to reply to
us.
Justice Venkataraman suo motto appointed Advocate
Commissioner, who submitted his report on 23.12.2008 before Justice K.
Venkataraman. His report completely exposed the trustees and their devious
manipulations and their ill-intentions towards us. Not one accommodation, as
cited by the trustees, met the criteria set by Justice K. Venkataraman. All the
guest houses chosen by us fit within the stipulated criteria, ‘International
Guest House’ being the most suitable and which had even agreed to provide
accommodation. (See posting dated 30.12.2008)
Meanwhile we had also written to the Chief Justice
of Madras High Court, Justice H.L. Gokhale, and asked him to transfer our case from
Justice Venkataraman’s court to anyone else because he was prejudiced in favor
of the trustees and because of him another inmate was thrown out on the street
and was living on the charity of the church. (What a shame on the trustees that
inmates, who have dedicated their entire lives to the Ashram, are forced to
live on the charity of the church!) (See posting dated 03.10.2014)
This letter had made Justice K. Venkatarman
spitting mad and also because the Advocate Commissioner’s report was so
damaging to the trustees, Justice K. Venkataraman became vindictive towards us
and repeatedly berated and belittled our lawyer in the open court. His hostility
became unbearable and with a heavy heart we asked our lawyer to report ‘no
instructions’ and give up vakalat. We were assured that before the case came up
for orders, we would be issued with summons either from the court or from the
trustees intimating to us the date of appearance. No such thing happened.
More than 1 ½ years after submission of the
Advocate Commissioner’s report, Justice K. Venkatarman suddenly brought up the
matter, without issuing us summons either through court or through the
trustees. Then without taking into account a third party’s objective findings
as directed by the court, viz. the Advocate Commissioner’s report, Justice K. Venkatarman
proceeded to pass his third impugned order dated 21.06.2010 in M.P. No.2/2008
in C.R.P. No.3314/2007, illegally modifying his own order for a second time. We
are directed to accommodate ourselves at ‘Jenny Working Women’s Hostel’.
By repeatedly entertaining the frivolous petitions
filed by the trustees, Justice K. Venkataraman not only lowered the stature of the High Court to that of
a Trial Court and misused his discretionary powers of superintendence under Article
227 of the Constitution, but he also illegally modified two times his own order
under the guise of clarification resulting in unsought for eviction proceedings.
